Adnovum sees itself as a strong proponent and advocate of the accelerating developments of AI. From providing conversational AI solutions to our clients, applying AI tools to our own in-house processes, to examining the impact of AI on business and society, we have gathered substantial experience in the practical application of this exciting new technology. Dávid Balakirev, Regional CTO of Adnovum Hungary, recently spoke with Prof. Dr. Clemente Minonne of the Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts about AI-related topics that tend to get overlooked: the real-world implications and challenges of rolling out AI in a company and its psychological repercussions on staff. With this interview as a departure point, Dávid gives us a comprehensive examination on how to create an environment in which employees accept and make secure use of AI’s potential.
Generally speaking, the major psychological factors of importance that affect personnel can be divided into four categories:
Employees …
… want to feel that what they do has an impact.
… want to feel competent, to be an expert within their field.
… strive for a feeling of self-determination.
… want to do meaningful work and thus gain a sense of purpose and value.
This classification is inspired by the categories Daniel Pink outlined in his 2009 book Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates US, these being autonomy, mastery, and purpose. These factors play a vital role in increasing employee satisfaction and retention, as well as enhancing their motivation to leave their comfort zone, raise their aspirations, and achieve greater performance.
The ways generative AI can positively influence employees in all four of these categories are evident. Increased productivity results in a greater contribution to a project, which means this contribution figures more prominently in the final product. Expanded capabilities, improved working speed, and a satisfying workflow greatly strengthen their confidence in themselves as experts and achievers in their field. Assistance provided by a copilot and other AI programming aids makes them less reliant on superiors or colleagues; all these factors combined give them a greater sense of value and purpose.
But there are also other aspects at play. Junior staff may be unsure of the software code or other work they created and hesitate to present it for fear of appearing incompetent. The AI can inspect such code, check its viability, and offer pointers for ironing out any flaws. It can basically act as a non-judgmental reviewer who is available whenever needed, even on a Friday evening when no one else is around.
This can be of particular help to young programmers who are entering the workforce for the first time. Assistance through AI could strengthen their confidence in themselves and be a source of comfort in dealing with certain psychological issues, such as anxiety or the imposter syndrome.
«Despite all managerial and business benefits: Our first and foremost aim is to help our employees unlock their true potential.» Karin Bühler |
|
In theory, the top-down approach emphasizes an overarching and abstract examination of AI opportunities and their general usefulness for the company. As practiced by Adnovum, the top-down approach consists of the CTO and his team being at the forefront of identifying and examining industry trends. This analysis is converted into a company-wide strategy that defines the approach the company wants to follow and the goals it intends to achieve. This is communicated to the entire company with the aim of getting everyone on board by explaining the vision and convincing staff of the viability and sound footing of their approach.
And everyone in this context literally means everyone. Adnovum is working on a program that does not distinguish between tech and non-tech staff. All employees in our organization are equipped with appropriate AI tools, official company guidelines for their use, and a number of tasks and sample projects that help them gain a good fundamental knowledge of and practice in using AI. This guided introduction aims to help personnel recognize the idea, the potential, but also the risks of AI.
Within Adnovum, the market units are a major factor in shaping the company strategy for AI. They have long established contacts with and profound insight into the industries they focus on, be it banking, insurance, logistics, or public service. This allows them not only to provide valuable feedback regarding the suitability of the company approach for these industries, but also to relay industry-specific trends in the use of AI to the CTO team for consideration in their strategic planning.
The other approach is to, knowingly or unknowingly, leave staff to their own devices. They can tinker with AI tools in the context of their specific tasks and assess their performance and value in every-day use. Of special note are the early adopters. These particularly eager employees will always start using new technology, either in their work or in their own time, as soon as they can get their hands on it. In general, such enthusiasts can act as «champions» within the company: major proponents who encourage others to engage with the new tools and serve as a contact point for questions and concerns.
In practice, however, the bottom-up strategy is basically equivalent to the phenomenon of «shadow adoption». Without the guidance or maybe even knowledge of executive management, this approach may easily evolve into a major headache for the entire company. Early adopters can be overenthusiastic in their embrace of new technologies and disregard the associated pitfalls. And employees who aren’t provided enterprise-ready tools will most likely make use of free-to-use offerings available online, which is exceedingly problematic in terms of data security.
As implied in the descriptions above, Adnovum follows a hybrid approach. The CTO with his team, as well as the Market Units, are responsible for rolling out AI solutions and, most importantly, defining, updating, and enforcing a regulatory framework. And all the risks of the bottom-up strategy notwithstanding, we clearly recognize and welcome the valuable input departments, project teams, and every individual employee contribute with their continuous feedback and suggestions.
In sum, our explorations into the AI field are by no means bound by hierarchical structures. Management must ensure adherence to the guidelines, but individual Market Units, departments, project teams, and employees are encouraged to initiate and pursue their own pilot projects, proofs of concept, and experiments. This more “democratic” approach generates a wealth of perspectives on the AI matter and helps us detect more use cases for our offering and internal processes. And above all, it prevents a rigid tunnel vision that overlooks promising applications of AI and fails to arouse enthusiasm and gain acceptance among employees.
With the number of pitfalls associated with any new evolving field of technology, and particularly so with AI, it is of vital importance that the leadership team define a common understanding, a roadmap that specifies the rollout of AI. As this is an intricate matter with many unknowns, a generic guideline won’t suffice. Complex questions must be answered and important issues clarified to ensure that employees are comfortable using AI tools and can leverage them to the greatest advantage. These issues include but are not limited to:
The first step in this process are webinars as a practical way to reach all employees. Within these presentations, executive management should address the following issues, preferably in dedicated sessions where more detail is required:
The webinars lay the groundwork for using AI tools, which should be complemented by further education that covers both theoretical and practical grounds. This can be internal workshops that present instructions for specific use cases, accompanied by smaller exercises or sample projects to give staff practice with AI tools. External training offerings, potentially including certification, are also imaginable.
While the webinars and workshops provide ample opportunity for staff to ask questions and clarify open matters, the true communication within the company at large occurs on intranet forums. These fulfil a number of purposes:
This last point is particularly important, as communication in this regard will never be done. One way of keeping staff in the loop are regular intranet news posts. These inform personnel of, for example, updates and other maintenance to the AI models, new functionalities, and action to be taken by staff. Larger rollouts and major adjustments to the governance guidelines, however, should again be conveyed through mandatory and company-wide webinars.
«We are at the very beginning of AI’s development. Many more disruptions are undoubtedly coming and will require continuous adoption.» Beat Fluri |
|
Software development is one of the first areas that come to mind when utilizing generative AI, which isn’t too surprising. It is the field it emerged from, and lends itself very well to the strengths of AI in producing abstract code. From creating, refactoring, translating, and reviewing code to generating documentation and fixing bugs, the potential applications of AI in software development are plentiful. For more details on AI in software engineering, take a look at our deep dive into the topic on our blog.
In a recent (non-representative) survey among our staff, we asked our employees what benefits they have experienced so far from using generative AI:
But having enhanced creativity tied for the top spot wasn’t quite that expected. Of course, hopes were high that delegating mundane tasks to AI would free developers’ hands for more interesting tasks, but that it would translate into a boost in creativity so quickly and so strongly comes to some surprise. This may be because generative AI, apart from giving room for creativity, can help in gathering ideas from which users can take inspiration or even individual elements to create something of their own.
This last aspect most probably also plays a role in improved decision-making, coming in a distant third with nonetheless notable 17 mentions. Generative AI can help identify available options and excels at analyzing large sets of data. This paves the way for a particularly organized and comprehensive approach in which decision makers can diligently weigh up the pros and cons of each individual course of action.
Looking at the lower end of the spectrum, we see job enrichment with 11 mentions. But this doesn’t have to be bad news for companies seeking to improve employee satisfaction. We are still at the beginning of the AI journey, and caution is highly advised. Accordingly, our employees are proceeding carefully with our exploration of AI: they predominantly remain within their own fields of expertise and closely observe the input and output data to guarantee the results are accurate and serviceable.
The feeling of job enrichment will most likely rise as employees become more capable and more comfortable in using AI and assessing its risks. But for now, they are following clear guidelines in implementing AI to ensure its use is secure and there is no ill effect on business operations.
Dos |
Don'ts |
Develop guidelines for the use of AI |
Overestimate the capabilities of AI; humans should remain firmly in the driver’s seat |
Protect sensitive data |
Rely exclusively on AI |
Start using generative AI on minor, non-business-critical projects |
Neglect other tools and aids for the task at hand |
Use AI in fields in which you have a substantial degree of expertise |
|
Keep a keen professional eye out for biases, problematic content, and hallucinations |
|
Review AI-generated materials for copyrighted source material and bugs (potentially placed by malicious actors) |
|
Disclose to colleagues, superiors, and clients when generative AI has been (or is planned to be) used in producing code or other work results |
|
Solicit user feedback to spot problems and improve working techniques |
At the fundamental level, we continuously examine the enterprise-ready solutions currently on the market, such as Microsoft Copilot, GitHub Copilot, and Azure OpenAI Service. One aspect of primary concern are the assurances these providers offer regarding legal protection, the quality of training data, and data security, among others. Furthermore, we experiment with these services to determine which is most suitable for our purposes and offers the most added value.
In software engineering
This predominantly occurs in the field of software development. Within test use cases and matters concerning our internal processes, we examine the performance of each service and how they fit in with our operations and tasks. These tests were and are being conducted within a safe environment in non-business-critical, non-sensitive projects to prevent any violation of our security protocols.
Assistance in administrative tasks
Our evaluations aren’t limited to software development. Non-technical staff have also been testing AI tools in their specific areas. Initially, this often was of a more playful character, such as generating images or texts for news or social posts on our intranet. The experience gained from these applications was soon transferred to more business-relevant matters. For example, staff are experimenting with generative AI integrated in conventional office applications to visualize specific problems or procedures, create drafts for texts and presentations, analyze datasheets, and summarize internal correspondence and communications. And all this in a fraction of the time when compared to previous processes.
Improving and expanding the portfolio
And finally, we have been undertaking initiatives to examine how AI can enrich our products and services or help create new offerings. In an ideal scenario, this leads to market-ready solutions, as has been the case with our conversational AI products. But even if an attempt is not crowned by prompt success, we gain a lot of experience and insights during these efforts. This deepens our understanding of the potential and opportunities offered by AI and lays a sound foundation for our future endeavors toward new use cases and applications.
With all the potential and promise that AI and its various use cases hold, this new frontier is not without risks. The entire process of adopting AI is a delicate balancing act. You don’t want to be a late adopter; experts in their field with a keen interest in new developments will most likely feel the urge to be at the forefront of exploring, experiencing, and trying out new opportunities as soon as they become available. On the other hand, you don’t want to risk tarnishing the reputation of your organization or even cause harm to your clients by falling into the pitfalls that inherently accompany new technologies.
The potential roadblocks that could cause a company to stumble on their path towards AI adoption can be divided into two categories: external and internal challenges.
And a more detailed look:
The results reveal a sober and realistic perspective among our employees. It is indeed easy to make the case that data security and the AI-generated hallucinations represent, at least in the short term, the chief obstacles to secure and beneficial AI adoption. Not only are they a source of risk regarding both safe application and quality of output, they also require extra effort to ensure satisfactory results. Several respondents to the survey pointed out that time savings through AI can be minimal if users need to take additional precautions for data security, prompt the AI, and keep an alert eye out for hallucinations.
While the first two spots reflect the most immediate concerns regarding AI, the lower ranks mirror the more long-term potential risks. Seeing the issue of job security in last place is indeed a relief, but this doesn’t mean it can be ignored entirely. There is a distinct chance that this concern will become more prevalent as AI gains sophistication and reliability. This goes in line with another impression respondents have expressed in the survey:
It is striking that feelings of isolation in the workplace have already emerged, even if it is only reported by a minority. Like the worries over job security, this phenomenon may very well spread as AI’s evolution proceeds. If employees increasingly use AI as a first point of contact, combined with the continued use of home office, the workplace could eventually see less inter-personal relationships, and consequently become less enjoyable for employees. For companies seeking not only to boost productivity but also enrich the working experience of their staff, this could be a risky development.
«I have always benefitted from the assistance of senior colleagues and superiors. They can impart knowledge, wisdom, and the tricks of the trade that come only with years of experience.» Dávid Csákvári |
|
We firmly believe that generative AI will bring substantial changes to businesses in the coming years. The astonishing capabilities, the numerous use cases, and the many areas of application for AI all have tremendous potential. It is our stated goal to bring benefits and improvements to virtually all levels of our company:
But we are very aware of the dangers involved in this new technology, and we must walk down this path carefully. We believe a risk-conscious approach here serves a dual purpose: for one, we must prevent any threat to our company, our employees, our solutions, and our clients. Furthermore, we want to provide added value to our clients by making the potential of AI available to them without the associated risks. The three cornerstones for this are:
Throughout its more than 30 years of history, Adnovum has seen many major developments in IT, but few of them can rival the paradigm shift AI has in store for the industry and society at large. Like the internet, which evolved from a platform mostly used by tech aficionados into the dominant means of social interaction today, AI is transcending the technological milieu and starting to permeate our personal and professional lives. And this will come with dramatic changes.
AI will not replace employees, but employees using AI may replace those who don’t. Companies must therefore do their best to aid their personnel in welcoming, adopting, and embracing the new possibilities of AI: create a regulatory framework that ensures secure use, provide staff with the appropriate tools and opportunities to acquire AI skills, and be open to hearing and addressing the concerns and feedback of employees. And most importantly, promote the appreciation of human talent and abilities.
AI may make us painfully conscious of our shortcomings in, for example, the analysis of big data or speedy generation of texts and images. But one must keep in mind the shortcomings of AI regarding creativity, ingenuity, resourcefulness, and common sense. After all, AI can only tread down the paths that millions of people have laid out for it. So, maybe the greatest potential of AI isn’t its boost to productivity or profitability, but the ability to give us all more room to celebrate our uniquely human qualities.
This blog post was inspired by an interview between Dávid Balakirev, Regional CTO of Adnovum Hungary, and Prof. Dr. Clemente Minonne of the Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts.